I know that I frequently express my frustration with the WiX development experience. But there is one thing that I really like about WiX: How darn pretty the XML is. The declarative nature of MSI and the way the data is stored in multiple tables really makes it hard to describe an implementation detail in writing.
For example, I can describe an EXE CA stored in the binary table, scheduled in the execute sequence after InstallInitiatize with no impersonation and deferred execution.
If you have a solid MSI background, you probably have enough information to proceed. But if you are new at MSI and you need me to SHOW you how that all works it can be interesting trying to write it down.
One approach might be to try to describe the table relationships:
NewBinary1 stream in Notepad.exe data here
NewCustomAction1 3074 NewBinary1
I might also try to express the relationships in .IDT format or perhaps MSI2XML ( which InstallShield uses ) but the end result is data that’s hard to read and understand. After all, just what the heck is 3074 and 1501 without digging in to understand? Worse, it’s not `code` that can be easily stolen ( umm, I mean copy and pasted hehehe ).
<Binary Id=”Notepad.exe” SourceFile=”notepad.exe”/>
Return=”check” HideTarget=”no” Execute=”deferred” Impersonate=”no”
TerminalServerAware=”no” ExeCommand=”” BinaryKey=”Notepad.exe”/>
<Custom Action=”CustomAction1″ After=”InstallInitialize” />
Still, don’t expect me to be reading/writing installs like Neo in the Matrix. IMO this is all great, but designers still rule in authoring the majority of my installation logic because of the productivity and reliability gains achieved in automating the authoring.